Archive | Other RSS feed for this section

Holiday Celebrations

11 Apr

Well the holidays are upon us, so time to take a look at some inspiring events from the various war zones the BDSers chose to open up over the last few weeks.

Starting off with an event that put all the boycotter’s loathsome tactics and abhorrent behavior on display, a divestment resolution suddenly appeared on the agenda of the Student Assembly at Cornell last Tuesday, which meant a vote on the matter would take place over the coming week.  Actually, the original agenda made no mention of the measure – consisting of standard SJP boilerplate – but a re-send later in the day added it to the bottom of a long list of items.

Coincidentally (NOT!), discussion and voting on this measure would have taken place over a period when (quelle coincidence!) many Jews would be heading home (or would already at home) for Passover.

Thankfully, students at Cornell were able to organize a response rapidly enough to get the whole sordid thing tabled indefinitely yesterday afternoon (effectively killing the measure).

I’ll let this video from the vote (which ended with the usual BDSer tantrum) tell the tale:

Yes, once again, screaming at everyone who doesn’t do what you say is standard operating procedure for the current generation of Israel haters.

Actually, it’s also the tactic of choice for the last generation, as displayed by this articulate British fellow peeved over the fact that his group’s ongoing picketing of an Ecostream store in the UK (which sells evil Sodastream dispensers) has been met by effective, good-humored and hugely successful counter-protests by Sussex Friends of Israel:

And moving back one generation further, 85-year-old Saul Zabar dealt with the you-know-what-holes asking him why he wasn’t taking their phone calls by telling them point-blank “I didn’t think you were worth it.”  (Truer words were never spoken.)

But for better or worse, it is still worth it for some of us to continue working towards the continued defeat of BDS, the weakest link in the entire chain of anti-Israel propaganda that goes under the label of “de-legitimization.”

And in that spirit (as well as the spirit of adding bitter herbs to an otherwise sweet upcoming holiday), it’s also worth noting some not-so-good news coming from a place I haven’t revisited yet this year: Olympia Washington where local activists who lost a lawsuit against the local food coop for their anti-Israel boycott recently had their appeal of that original court decision rejected.

Now if I were a BDSer, I would simply ignore that story (as they have ignored the fact that every other food coop in the country have used Olympia as an example of what NOT to do) or come up with some cockamamie way to translate that defeat into a disguised victory.  But one of the reasons the boycotters lose so often is the fact that they spend far too much time in their own virtual reality vs. the real one.

Personally, I prefer learning from experiences (good or ill).  And, in the case of Olympia (vs. stories coming out of Dartmouth, Sussex and Zabars) the lesson seems to reinforce what I’ve said in the past regarding the preferability of political vs. legal responses to BDS.  For, more often than not, whenever we engage with Israel’s opponents at the political level we tend to win.  But whenever a BDS-related case has gone to court, the people bringing the suit (usually the BDSers, BTW) have always lost.

This may sound like odd commentary, given that I provided expert testimony in the Olympia case.  But that contribution was motivated by the fact that I never say no to anyone asking for help in their BDS fights.  And for those who aren’t asking for such help right this moment, I’m going to give you some advice anyway:  put your energy into coming up with imaginative tactics based on a sound strategy articulated in skillful language and you too will probably have the pleasure of seeing the boycotters bellowing and blubbering in impotent rage, rather than celebrating and gloating at your expense.

Sign the Petition for an Open Jewish Voice for Peace!

8 Apr

Jewish-Voice-for-Peace-Divest-This-Logo

While Elder of Ziyon beat me to this particular gag, I realized that the whole Open Hillel tactic provided me the means to accomplish something I’ve been tempted to do for a while: continue my anti-BDS work as a member of Jewish Voice for Peace (JVP).

When I originally looked into what this might involve, I ran into the fact that JVP requires anyone joining their organization to sign a loyalty oath that commits them to supporting the organization’s pro-BDS agenda.  And since it would be dishonorable to sign up as a member with the specific intention of subverting their mission (even if such a move would reflect the true values of JVP), I decided to simply invest the $60 I would have spent on JVP membership dues into the sole proprietorship that is Divest This!.

But then the Open Hillel program, supported by Jewish Voice for Peace, demonstrated that an organization’s mission should in no way prevent those who oppose that mission from joining and doing whatever they like once inside the tent. So, in the spirit of openness, justice, fairness, inclusiveness, dialog and all kinds of other words with positive connotation, I present a humble petition in support of an Open JVP:

Background

Jewish Voice for Peace, an organization claiming to speak on behalf of Jews interested in a just peace in the Middle East, has chapters and affiliates across the US. Jewish Voice for Peace currently publishes its ”JVP Mission Statement,“ with a more detailed version appearing as part of their member registration form – a form which asks anyone interested in joining the organization to commit to “work in agreement with our [JVP’s] mission and guidelines.”

Included in these mission guidelines is support of international efforts to target Israel with Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns.  Specifically, joining the organization requires members to adhere to a mission statement which includes the following: “JVP rejects the assertion that BDS is inherently anti-semitic, and we encourage discussion both within our own community and outside of it of the growing BDS movement. JVP defends activists’ right to use the full range of BDS tactics without being persecuted or demonized…”

These guidelines are counterproductive to creating real conversation about BDS among JVP members, and prevents JVP chapters from exploring a full range of options, including supporting efforts to defeat BDS on college campuses and elsewhere, exposing the hypocrisy of the BDS movement and those that support it, discussing the possibility that BDS campaigns might actually be anti-Semitic and bigoted, highlighting the “movement’s” many frauds and failures, and producing parodies and funny songs about Omar Barghouti.

Requiring support of the BDS agenda for membership in JVP excludes the voices of those Jews dedicated to peace who have honest disagreements on how this peace can be achieved, shutting down open discourse on Israel and the Middle East. For example, these rules prevent sites like Divest This! (which is dedicated to defeating the BDS movement) from doing so as a member Jewish Voice for Peace, or from forming coalitions with other anti-BDS individuals and organizations as a representative of JVP.

Petition

As members of the Jewish community dedicated to a just peace we believe that Jewish Voice for Peace acknowledge and engage with a full spectrum of political views on the BDS movement. We see cooperation with anti-BDS groups on and off campus as an essential step towards peace and understanding. Furthermore, if Jewish Voice for Peace truly wants to be an organization dedicated to “Israelis and Palestinians: Two People’s One Future,” it cannot exclude Jewish groups simply for their political beliefs.

Therefore, we ask Jewish Voice for Peace to remove its guidelines for support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions “movement”, which currently exclude groups and individuals with particular political views from participating in the organization, and to make support for all other items on the organization’s mission statement optional.

 

Sign the Petition for an Open Jewish Voice for Peace!

Background

Jewish Voice for Peace, an organization claiming to speak on behalf of Jews interested in a just peace in the Middle East, has chapters and affiliates across the US. Jewish Voice for Peace currently publishes its "JVP Mission Statement," with a more detailed version appearing as part of their member registration form – a form which asks anyone interested in joining the organization to commit to “work in agreement with our [JVP’s] mission and guidelines.”

Included in these mission guidelines is support of international efforts to target Israel with Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) campaigns.  Specifically, joining the organization requires members to adhere to a mission statement which includes the following: “JVP rejects the assertion that BDS is inherently anti-semitic, and we encourage discussion both within our own community and outside of it of the growing BDS movement. JVP defends activists' right to use the full range of BDS tactics without being persecuted or demonized...”

These guidelines are counterproductive to creating real conversation about BDS among JVP members, and prevents JVP chapters from exploring a full range of options, including supporting efforts to defeat BDS on college campuses and elsewhere, exposing the hypocrisy of the BDS movement and those that support it, discussing the possibility that BDS campaigns might actually be anti-Semitic and bigoted, highlighting the “movement’s” many frauds and failures, and to producing parodies and funny songs about Omar Barghouti.

Requiring support of the BDS agenda for membership in JVP excludes the voices of those Jews dedicated to peace who have honest disagreements on how this peace can be achieved, shutting down open discourse on Israel and the Middle East. For example, these rules prevent sites like Divest This! (which is dedicated to defeating the BDS movement) from doing so as a member Jewish Voice for Peace, or from forming coalitions with other anti-BDS individuals and organizations as a representative of JVP.

Petition

As members of the Jewish community dedicated to a just peace we believe that Jewish Voice for Peace acknowledge and engage with a full spectrum of political views on the BDS movement. We see cooperation with anti-BDS groups on and off campus as an essential step towards peace and understanding. Furthermore, if Jewish Voice for Peace truly wants to be an organization dedicated to "Israelis and Palestinians: Two People’s One Future," it cannot exclude Jewish groups simply for their political beliefs.

Therefore, we ask Jewish Voice for Peace to remove its guidelines for support of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions “movement”, which currently exclude groups and individuals with particular political views from participating in the organization, and to make support for all other items on the organization's mission statement optional.

[signature]

41 signatures

Share this with your friends:

   

 

Ballad of the BDSbyterians

26 Mar

bearing-witness-logo

Sorry for the delay, for those of you who can’t get enough of manic song lyrics regarding obscure situations.  (Actually, it took some time to tone down what I started to write.)

Anyway, in the spirit of the new BDSbyterian label I mentioned last time, I present a humble little ballad, sung to the tune (for the most part) of Modern Major General from Gilbert and Sullivan’s Pirates of Penzance.

The Ballad of the BDSbyterians

I am the very model of a BDSbyterian
I’m open to all points of view (especially if they’re Syrian)
Don’t bother me if you’re a Kurd, Tibetan or Nigerian
I am the very model of a BDSbyterian
 
Don’t talk to him if you’re a Kurd, Tibetan or Nigerian
Because he is the model of a BDSbyterian
 
I’m also well acquainted too with Judith Buter’s fond advice,
I understand facts fed to me by Hezbollah and Mondoweiss
I’ll happily toe Barghouti’s line regarding stocks the Church should ban
Because I am the model of a BDSbyterian
 
He’ll do whatever Omar says, yet claim to be a thinking man
That shows he is the model of a BDSbyterian
 
I also am the model of a terrorist apologist
My power for projecting guilt would stun a trained psychologist
How could this be? I do not know!  Go ask an anthropologist
I am the very model of a terrorist apologist
 
How could he warp his conscience so?  Go ask a trained psychologist
I guess it’s cause he’s made himself a terrorist apologist
 
I wipe my mind of what they do to Jew or homosexual
By leveraging the force of all my powers intellectual
Hamas missiles bore me so, I’ve not regard for where they land
Because I am the model of a BDSbyterian
 
Once rockets launch he has no care for whom they hit or where they land
Because he is the model of a BDSbyterian
 
One last point which proves that I’m a BDSbyterian
The Church must do my bidding or I’ll simply make them vote again
Divestment voted down five times is just a speedbump to my plan
And that’s why I’m the model of a BDSbyterian
 
He’ll make them vote a hundred times, or more because he know he can
And that’s why he’s the model of a BDSbyterian
 
My self-regard is buttressed by inflated moral vanity
My ego soaring while ignoring crimes against humanity
So IPMN writes pamphlets that are high-fived by the Ku Klux Klan
That’s not my problem cause I’m just a BDSbyterian
 
So what if David Duke is now his own committee’s biggest fan?
He doesn’t care because he is a BDSbyterian
 

A Panic-Driven Response to Omar Barghouti

3 Feb

As the leader of a “movement” that has accomplished next to nothing in close to fifteen years, Omar Barghouti seems to have developed special vision powers (perhaps learned while studying at an Israeli school he insists everyone in the world but he should boycott).  These powers allow him to see panic-stricken Israeli supporters on all sides that quiver in perpetual fear of BDS’s explosive growth that always seems to arrive in the form of a damp squib.

Barghouti’s latest New York Times piece (paired with a “rebuttal” by Hirsh Goodman which declares Israel to be guilty, but urges something other than boycotting as a punishment – great diversity of opinion Grey Lady!) demonstrates all the rhetoric ticks that give BDS staying power despite lack of concrete victory (incidental or otherwise).

Thus 16% of the American Studies Association’s membership voting for an academic boycott is a “landslide vote” while the stunning backlash against the boycott from across the academy goes unmentioned.  Or perhaps that is just part of the panicked response of Israeli supporters?  (Keep in mind that in the heads-I-win-tails-you-lose world of BDS, both the BDSers own activity and the overwhelmingly negative response it generates counts as a victories for them.)

Then you’ve got odd-hand quotes from people like Secretary of State John Kerry treated like official policy, without mentioning actual US policy which has been to reject and condemn boycott and divestment (as well as enforce anti-boycott legislation implemented by that Zionist stooge Jimmy Carter in the 1970s).

Mix in two parts Apartheid accusations, a sprinkling of “non-violence” and “we can’t be anti-Semitic because we’re anti-racists” and voila: the rhetorical magic that seems to have kept Mr. Barghouti on top of a movement willing to fly him around the planet, despite his inability to get anything bigger than a student council to do his bidding (and even then, only barely).

Oh, and speaking of BDS talking points, my favorite one that gets trotted out whenever someone mentions the Dear Leader’s hypocrisy of continuing to study and work at an Israeli college he insists be boycotted by everyone else is that even  Nelson Mandela once worked in a South Africa law office.  Perhaps those who use this pre-digested excuse can provide us information of how the administrators of a genuine Apartheid system allowed Mr. Mandela to travel the planet propagandizing against them (as opposed to putting him into jail for decades – a punishment Mr. Barghouti knows he will never face, unless he has to go into Israeli protective custody for those Mohammed cartoons he drew – Just kidding!).

Sorry, where was I?  Oh yes, I was giving my own panic-stricken response to BDS’s impending triumph (it must be panic stricken, since any criticism of the “movement” has been defined as falling into that category).

Look, as I’ve mentioned countless times in the past, Israel faces an set of existentialist crises: nations on all sides falling to pieces while declaring their eternal enmity to the Jewish state, new fanatical movements demonstrating their “authenticity” by escalating genocidal anti-Semitic rhetoric into the stratosphere, an Iran both nuclearizing and pouring arms into places like Gaza and Lebanon, and a global propaganda campaign dedicated to ensuring that when any of these players gets around to pulling the trigger, every step will be taken to limit Israel’s ability to shoot back.

BDS is just a small piece of a multi-faceted campaign that has already corrupted virtually every institution designed to deal with genuine human problems like war, bigotry, refugee crises and global poverty.  And while individuals have no control over what the tyrannical rulers of Israel’s opponents do next, and cannot cure the rot that has seeped into institutions like the United Nations, we do have some influence over the institutions of civil society we have created and helped to maintain.

And it is at this very grassroots level that BDS finds it impossible to achieve a lasting success without the kind of backroom deals designed specifically to get around the fact that the grassroots loathes their message and are disgusted by their behavior.

In fact, it has been the failure of BDS to achieve its goals at the level of civil society that has helped de-legitimize the entire de-legitimization movement, which is why the boycotters have to resort to badgering a film star about which soft drink she endorses in order to get anyone’s attention (ignoring the fact that the planet has already decided to flip them the bird by stocking up on Zionist bubbles and flavor).

Speaking of which I guess I need to get back to my “favorite” subject, BDS and celebrity, with a look into the whole Soda Stream, Oxfam, Scarlett Johansson brouhaha (*sigh*). Apologies if I take a day or two to get to it.

Perspective

16 Jan

One of the pieces that has gotten the most play on this site is this one which debunks BDS boasts of impending triumph with some figures demonstrating how little the “movement” has accomplished since it got off the ground at the now-notorious Durban I conference in 2001 (not 2005, BTW).

I suspect it is the power numbers have to demonstrate and persuade that makes the figures in this piece so illustrative of the true success and failure (mostly failure) of boycott, divestment and sanctions efforts.  For how can one argue that a boycott (which, using any conventional understanding of the term, would measure its success by the financial pain it causes the target) has been successful when the economy of that target doubled in size during the very decade the boycotters insisted people stop doing business with it?

Similarly, the doubling of exports during a period when BDSers worked tirelessly to get the public to stop buying Israeli goods (not to mention a ten point jump in popularity of the Jewish state during a decade when activists worked 24/7 to get the public to loath Israel as much as they did) better demonstrates gains and losses for the “movement” than would any pithy slogan or shouted argument.

Naturally, the boycotters have found a solution to how to deal with the challenge these numbers present: by adding this information to the huge pile of facts and arguments they routinely ignore.  Thus Israel’s blockbuster 2013 tourist year, the huge influx of investment in Israeli companies and the mad scramble of colleges and universities to forge partnerships with their Israeli counterparts must all take a backseat to Meg Ryan cancelling her vacation plans. (Whoops!  Looks like that was another BDS hoax.  Guess I’ll have to stop using Meg for my punchlines.)

Anyway, the trouble is that even if we embrace the notion that Elvis Costello cancelling a gig in Tel Aviv should be treated as vastly more significant than the billions in non-boycott, un-divestment, anti-sanctions activity that is driving the Israeli economy to ever greater heights, this doesn’t get around the problem that the whole premise behind BDS is farkakt, given that it presumes a nation which has withstood more than half a century of war, terrorism, propaganda assaults and economic blockade will suddenly buckle because some aging rock star decides to blow off his fans.

One could make the reasonable argument that people buying stock in Israeli companies or purchasing a second SodaStream for Christmas are making simple economic choices with no political implication. But remember it is Israel’s detractors, not its supporters, that have imbued such decisions with political importance.  Had they not thrown everything they had into getting Elton John to join their squalid little program, for instance, his visit to Israel would have been as politically significant as his appearance on the Cher show in 1975.  But once he defied their demands and went so far as to flip them the verbal bird on stage, suddenly his choices took on political meaning created entirely by the boycotters themselves.

The other argument against using actual results as a barometer of success or failure says that BDS is really not about causing the Jewish state economic pain or isolation.  Rather, it is a mechanism designed to inject into popular consciousness the propaganda message that Israel is an Apartheid state, alone in the world as deserving economic punishment.

The boycotters refer to this practice as “starting a conversation” (one they also claim is being stifled, despite the fact that members of “the movement” are shouting this messages at the top of their lungs in every forum in the land, sucking up all the Oxygen that might otherwise go into fighting against genuine human rights abusers – such as the nations most supportive of BDS).

Such an assertion (best illustrated by my favorite BDS quote of all time: the one that said “lack of concrete victory is incidental”) would mean that every time they go to a college president or student union asking them to back a divestment motion, every time they storm a retailer insisting that Israeli products get pulled off the shelves, every time they force a boycott vote at a food coop or academic association, they are really after something other than what  they claim they want these institutions to do.  Which means that every college, church, city, union, coop or association that has gotten caught up in the tumult of a BDS fight is really just serving as mere means to the Israel haters’ unspoken ends.

The last bit of perspective we should all keep in mind is that while the work being done to defeat propaganda activity at home is well worth the effort, big decisions (such as whether there will be war or peace in the region) are being made by geopolitical actors.  Hamas and Hezbollah (and their Iranian armorers) may take into account the fact that Israel’s response to rocket assaults may be limited by the protests of US and European “peace activists” who only spring into action once shooting goes in two directions rather than one.  But the decision to pull the trigger still lies with these groups, meaning political dynamics can change in an instant based on decisions we have no way of anticipating, much less preventing.

500 and Farewell

9 Mar

Having written close to half a million words on the subject of BDS over the last four years, it was nice to discover a graphic (actually the Google mashup Barbara pointed us towards) that so nicely sums up one of the key messages of Divest This: the utter failure of the Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions “movement” to achieve anything even closely resembling its goals.

It was a treat to learn over a year ago that BDSFail had morphed into an Internet meme (first in the form of a Twitter hashtag, then as a common term of reference).  But this wonderful #BDSFail map really highlights the triviality of the BDSers achievements over the last decade and a half.

To site just one example, the state of Ohio’s purchase of $42,000,000 in Israeli bonds immediately swamps whatever negative impact the boycotters have managed to afflict on the Israeli economy by several orders of magnitude.

And even in an era when the Israel haters have been reduced to trying to ram their laundry list of condemnations through student councils they have spent the last five years packing in their favor, it’s good to know that (1) everyone recognizes that such votes do not represent the opinion of the student body and can thus be ignored; and (2) they still lose these votes whenever they’re not able to get them passed behind the backs of the students these elected bodies are supposed to represent.

A couple of years back, I published this piece designed to put the whole BDS project into perspective.  In it, I mapped the trajectory of the Israeli economy and exports during the decade when the Israel haters were working feverishly to get the former reduced and the latter banned.  Yet it was during this same decade that both metrics doubled.  And given that the boycotters equate economic activity with political approval (or disapproval), I asked the obvious question (never answered, of course) of whether or not this proved Israeli to be one of the most popular countries in the world.

And speaking of popularity, the common wisdom is that BDS and similar de-legitimziation campaigns really don’t care about what they achieve practically, as long as they are introducing a steady drip of propaganda into the bloodstream of the body politic (especially among the young).  Yet as this recent story shows, Israel’s popularity continues to hang in that 60-70% approval rating amongst Americans, a figure that doesn’t seem to have moved despite decades of propaganda aimed at smearing the Jewish state.

Just as significantly, as Israel competes for the 6th vs. the 7th slot of popular American allies, the Palestinians have dropped to the bottom 5 (ending up only slightly more beloved than Syria, Pakistan and North Korea) with an approval rating of just 15% (vs. a stunning disapproval rating of 77%).

And remember that they have achieved this position without anyone running decades-long campaigns against them trying to get colleges, churches, cities, unions, et al to condemn the Palestinians for crimes against humanity.  Which makes one wonder if the thoughtless, boorish and bullying behavior of the BDSers has actually contributed to this low opinion of the people they claim to represent (vs. the high opinion Americans have of the state the BDSers would like to see become a figure of loathing).

Keep these figures in mind as the battle against the Israel haters continues, even as it does so without regular postings here at Divest This since, as I mentioned last month, this will be my final piece at this site.

For that battle must continue as long as the BDS cru continues their squalid little campaigns, just as the war against Israel will continue as long as those who wage it make it their top priority (regardless of how much it drags their societies into savage politics fueled by ruthlessness and one-upmanship regarding who can demonstrate more fervent Jew hatred – whoops I mean “Zionist hatred”).

Since we are not responsible for the beginning and continuation of this war, we have no ability to make it stop.  But we can do our part to ensure such aggression continues to fail in hope that the aggressors finally come to their senses and begin to work for the betterment of their people, rather than enforce their continued suffering.

To a certain degree, it’s easy to feel powerless as individuals facing the challenges presented by the Arab war against the Jews.  After all, we are in no position to prevent Hamas or Hezbollah from pulling the trigger, any more than we can prevent competitors for power in Egypt or Syria from reaching for the Israel card to prop up their own corrupt and/or flailing regimes.  Nor can we prevent the coalition of 50+ Arab and Muslim states that dominate global institutions from using their numbers, wealth and power to rain non-stop condemnations against the Jewish state (while simultaneously blocking discussion of their own endless crimes).

But this is where the fight against BDS becomes so crucial.  For while we as individuals have little ability to affect the decisions of state actors or global organizations, we do have influence over the civil society in which we live (i.e., the schools, churches, cities, unions, et al that the BDSers work tirelessly to corrupt).

In fact, it’s been the activity of many of you reading this blog that has turned the tide against BDS, ensuring that terms like “failure,” “fraud,” “bullying” and “hypocrisy” become synonymous with the BDS “movement” as a whole.

For BDS is not just a link in the chain of the wider de-legitimization propaganda war directed against Israel.  It is the weakest link in that chain.  And its weakness derives from the fact that (1) it requires independent people and organizations to do their bidding to have any impact; and (2) those independent people and organizations are open to other opinions – including ours.

So while we cannot prevent Syria from leveling more charges of human rights abuses against Israel at the  UN (presuming it can find the time to do so between murdering more of its own people), we can ensure that BDS the loser, BDS the liar, BDS the hypocrite characterizes the entire de-legitimization effort from top to bottom.  And in so doing, we can de-legitimize the de-legitimizers and thus ensure the propaganda war against the Jewish state fails just as miserably as all of the other forms of warfare these same people use, excuse or cheer on.

And so the fight continues.  And even if I won’t be making weekly postings on the subject, I will be continuing my work just as all of you continue yours.  And together, we cannot just ensure a second decade of defeat for Israel’s would-be tormenters, but ensure the numbers that began this piece continue to go in the right direction.

I’d like to give a hearty thank you to everyone who has read this blog over the years, especially those who have contributed to the discussion via comments and personal communication.

Someone once described political blogging (especially that which involves specialized subjects like this one) as the equivalent of dropping pebbles in the water where you never know where the ripples might ultimately reach.  And while I’m thrilled to know the ideas presented here have reached some of the most thoughtful, courageous, creative activists in the country, I’ll be most excited when the themes I’ve written about become common wisdom among people who have never heard of Divest This.

And with that, it’s time to sign off.  And as you carry on the fight, keep an eye out for me standing right beside you.

Shalom,

Jon