Reality Check – Egypt

News on both the BDS and international fronts keep delaying some of the commentary I was planning to do on the upcoming PCUSA divestment debate (which may be a good thing, given how uncharitably I’ve been feeling about the organization over the last year which will likely lead to some less-than-kindly words I may end up regretting).

But the recent election of an Islamist government in Egypt presents one of those times that it’s worth doing some political analysis normally beyond the scope of this blog, if only to put what both pro- and anti-BDS activists do into the proper perspective.

While local or online activism can be a wonderful thing (or at least an empowering experience, used for either good or ill), we all need to keep in mind that the primary driver of history is political and military power, which can also be wielded for both good and evil.

Many commentators have already talked about the delusional way we Westerners looked at the so-called “Arab Spring” which our media filtered through its own experience of youth counter-culture and middle-class “revolution.”  Yet, as anyone with eyes could see, in a situation where unlimited political power was up for grabs, guns and fanaticism would be a bigger driving force for change than Facebook accounts.

There are two competing “narratives” regarding the sources of misery in the Middle East, one that focuses all attention on Israel (or metaphysical entities such as “Zionism” and “Settlements”).  While proponents of this view are rarely so reductive as to claim that the entire region would be in a state of bliss if only the Zionist interloper was removed from the map (or had never come into being in the first place), they have no problem bringing every conversation about any Middle East subject (current or historic) back to their one topic of concern: “The Occupation”.

The Palestinian variant on this narrative (embraced by those who support BDS) sees 1948 as a Nakbah – a catastrophe – which destroyed an idyllic land called “Palestine,” whose restoration will not only bring redemption to “The Palestinian People,” but to the Arab world as a whole.  Within this context, discussion of any other political issue related to the Middle East is immaterial.

Those of us who reject this reductionist view have tried to actually include the Middle East in any discussions of the Middle East.  And as difficult as it is to come to grips with painful reality, that region has been a political basket case for generations, with all-powerful kings giving way to all-powerful military dictators who now face challenges by religious fanatics.

In each of these transitions, a sure-fire way an up-and-coming power uses to legitimize itself is to embrace hatred of Israel (tied to the “Palestinian Paradise Lost” narrative described above) to one up competitors (who are characterized as sell-outs and agents of Zionism and imperialism).  This is why Arab leaders frequently accuse their enemies of being closet Zionists (or even secret Jews). 

This is also why the Palestinian refugee issue, alone of all refugee issues in the world, has never been solved.  While, like every other refugee challenge throughout human history, it would have cost something to settle the question decades ago, it has cost hundreds of times more in terms of money and ruined lives to keep the Palestinian issue on a perpetual boil to ensure there would always be foot soldiers for a uncompromising revolution that would ultimately deliver a fantasized redemption.

As fanatics continue to gain the upper hand, we can expect the immiseration of the region to accelerate, despite the fact (or, more likely because of the fact) that unearned oil wealth greases the wheels of rejectionism and ensures that no political misjudgment or mistake can’t be covered over (or at least pushed down the road) through an adequate application of petrodollars.

And as the people of Egypt lose whatever human rights their previous tyrants allowed them, we can expect a further intensification of hostility targeting the one enemy all can agree to hate: the Jewish state (or, as more and more frequently and openly stated, just the Jews).

And before anyone starts raving that this analysis is “racist” for daring to use the word “Arab” when analyzing Arab states and Arab politics, keep in mind that we have seen this whole story play out previously in other parts of the world.  Most notably, there’s 20th century Europe where competing flavors of totalitarianism slit each other’s throats before a World War that cost millions of lives and left a continent ruined, followed by a Cold War that kept the world on nuclear high alert for decades, demonstrating that no regions or people are immune from the Totalitarian Temptation.

This doesn’t mean that “movements” like BDS should be regarded as anything less than a weapon system masquerading as a peace movement, or that we should slow in any way our challenges to their attempts to infect civil society with their toxic agenda.

But we should keep in mind what a small part in the overall story we and our opponents are playing as men with guns and zeal continue to define the world in which the rest of us have to live.

11 thoughts on “Reality Check – Egypt”

  1. Unfortunately – or fortunately – depending on how optimistic or pessimistic you want to be – local and domestic political attitudes and development can eventually have an effect halfway across the world.

    As you have pointed out many times, the true goal of BDS is to pound their lies enough to turn public opinion against Israel. And that can have significant geopolitical consequences. Look at this guy running for Congress in New York as a David Duke protogee, Charles Barron. He probably won't win, but if he did, and if eventually a number of similarly hateful people also did around the country, it could affect US Mideast policy to the detriment of Israel and the benefit of Islamists and secular Arab tyrants alike.

    1. That Charles Barron is taken seriously by anybody, let alone my very own political party, is simply a disgrace. Let's hope the election postmortems tomorrow are the last time we ever hear of that racist lunatic again.

  2. Wow. You're right, Jon. I can't imagine why the Egyptians would elect an anti-American, anti-Zionist political party, especially after the United States spent three wonderful decades and billions of dollars funding the regime of the tyrannical dictator who abused and oppressed them. And never mind that 80 million Egyptians may be on the verge of actual democracy for the first time in their thousands-years history, because clearly the peace agreement with Israel (which is hardly at risk as is) trumps any and all Egyptian democratic aspirations. Oh and by the way, if anyone wonders why the Egyptians elected a government critical of the US and Israel, let's just chalk it up to medieval anti-semitism and radical religious dogma and certainly not to any of the very real roles that foreign interference played in their generations-long oppression.

    1. Gosh – America (and Israel) are responsible again for anything bad happening anywhere in the Middle East!

      No doubt Iran’s Islamic revolution as well as Egypt’s slide towards Islamism have nothing to do with Islamism, which must not even exist (except as a reaction to American cynicism and taking the form of noble anti-imperialism and a calls for democracy).

      Ah, democracy! Non-existent in Israel, of course, since it has only had dozens of elections throughout its history when power was transferred peacefully from one group of leaders to another. But in those blessed Palestinian territories democracy flourishes since the people with the most guns also win the most votes! That’s why Yassir Arafat died in the eighth year of his five year term, Abbas is following a similar trajectory, and Hamas won the vote but, more importantly, a violent coup and shows no sign over ever letting go of power – for it is a democracy as defined throughout the Middle East (as well as certain corners of the BDS “movement”) of one-person, one-vote, once.

      In days of old, the term “perfidious Albion” described the desire to lay blame for all ills of the world at the feet of Great Britain. And while both Britain (and America) have much to answer for, I believe you will find that ruthless actors and brutal political movements can and do exist on their own – even in places like the Middle East which you would prefer we judge as nothing more than nations of children with no moral agency for their own decisions and actions.

  3. Good post! I continue to be amazed at the lengths the Western media is going to, to avoid dealing with the reality of the situation. When they win a democratic election by a 50%+ margin… at what point do you stop calling them fanatics and start calling the Egyptians?

  4. Anonymous: No wonder you support BDS. You also happen to think the Egyptians elected Morsi because of Israel. So you know nothing about Israel or about Egypt – how surprising.

    1. Or about Islam or about the Muslim Brotherhood and it's sharia caliphate mandate. This kind of thing is normaling rapidly now that the Brotherhood has taken power.
      Without basic knowledge of essential decisive factors in the matter, particularly Islamic doctrine and it's theo-social dynamics, people like the anon Israel obsessive above will continue to be unable to formulate meaningful views on the subject of their fantasy obsession.

    2. What I meant is that they are truly blinded by a cloud of ignorance indefinitely maintained by their obsessiveness, which keeps them from expanding their knowledge perhaps ever (except for those who eventually shift in the course of maturation).

      Case in point being that he opines so urgently without even basic awareness of Islamic doctrine, history, and related implications which are so decisive wrt Egypt, as it is in the matter of their obsession. They don't believe they need anything but their kool-aid of the Mondoweiss variety, and indeed consequently lack so very much.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.