Comments Are Free-ky

A colleague runs a Web site called CIFwatch which monitors activity on one of those great Wild Wild West bastions of online debate: the Comment is Free forum hosted by the UK’s Guardian newspaper.

As has been noted previously, Europe has not just been a test-lab for BDS activity but is also a continent where Israel-dislikers routinely probe to see how far they can push the limits of civilized behavior in the name of their political agenda. And in the UK, where intimidation and even violence are part of the anti-Israel toolkit, those with an ax to grind against the Jewish state seen to have found a home at Comment is Free.

This manifests itself in a number of ways, including comments on stories having to do with Israel which attract five to ten times the number of comments on most other pieces, with a higher percentage of moderator deletions than you will find elsewhere at Comment is Free. An extra level of supervision seems to be required for such Israel-related stories, partly to prevent arguments from getting out of hand, but mostly to avoid an embarrassing paper trail of anti-Semitic graffiti that might alert the public about the nature of a large part of the Guardian’s audience.

This Wild Wild West nature of online political discourse goes back to the beginning of the Internet when forums such as UseNet seethed with anti-Semitic conspiracy theories by bizarre characters such as Israel Shahak and Hal Womack. My favorite was a fellow named Joachim Martillo who spent his UseNet years railing against Arabs (which he characterized as uncivilized brutes in need of immediate re-conquest), only to transform into a passionate Jew hater in love with the Palestinian cause in the years (and forums) since.

To a certain extent, advocates for BDS (and their fans) avoid online embarrassment by simply not allowing comments on the many, many sites they manage. For example, when I took part in my last real session of online debate a few years back (at the Jewish Voice for Peace’s Muzzlewatch, a site dedicated to the dubious proposition that anti-Israel points of view – screamed from the rooftops of every campus in the land – is somehow stifled or “muzzled”), the owners of the site eventually became embarrassed both by both their critics and supporters.

You see, critics routinely embarrassed them by pointing out the ridiculousness of their site’s premise and challenging them to defend their positions. And (as at Comment is Free), JVP supporters embarrassed the organization by spewing anti-Jewish bile (including calls for Jews to be deported from the US), providing a window into the soul of JVP/Muzzlewatch’s fan base.

Rather than deal with this problem through a judicious use of moderation, Muzzlewatch simply shut down their comment section entirely under a pretext of avoiding anti-Jewish and anti-Arab hysteria from poisoning discourse (despite the abundance of the former and complete lack of the latter). In addition to avoiding further embarrassment, this allowed them to avoid staring too deeply into the abyss of what their political activity has wrought.

Why bring this up at an anti-BDS site? Well as has been noted before, online commentary is a good barometer regarding how much a community has been poisoned via the importation of the Middle East conflict. And while open forums such as Comment is Free have decided to live with the fallout of creating a discussion of Middle East conflict open to all, other organizations (notably BDS supporters) demonstrate that opening your community up to debate on every issue of the day is purely optional.

In short, every college, every church, every food co-op, every radio station, every civic organization is not required to take a stand on the Arab-Israeli conflict (and, in the process, allow the raw sewerage represented by the hysteria found at CIF to flow unchecked into their community). Despite the fact that the BDSers demand immediate access to the civic space of everyone else, they also demonstrate by their own behavior how protective they are of whatever spaces and forums they control.

So before taking the boycotters seriously when they next insist that your school, your church, your city or town must open up their doors and let photos of bloody babies and accusations of illegality and bigotry be shoved in the face of everyone in your community, keep in mind that a debate over BDS or anything else is purely optional. And just as champions of BDS routinely decide what can and cannot be discussed and debated within their communities, so too your choice of which issues are to given a hearing is just that: your choice.

, , , , , , , , ,

4 Responses to Comments Are Free-ky

  1. Anonymous July 30, 2011 at 2:34 am #

    CIF watch
    campus watch
    huffington post watch

    Name a few more Jon.

    I am sure there are Israel apologist groups out there that have setup “watches” for the NYT, NPR, al jazeera, etc….any and all criticism of Israel needs to be “watched” and attacked and negated.

    I have never seen a group of people set up so many “watches” on all the “bad” people of the world….such victims you are.

    It does not end with victimhood, victimhood results in entitlement, entitlement results in the current right wing and anti democratic government in Israel that talks the talk but has absolutely no interest in a just peace. Build baby build.

  2. DrMike July 30, 2011 at 7:49 pm #

    Anonymous has it wrong of course. There's far more criticism of Israel in it's own free press than in all the other countries of the region combined; I'm sure critics of Hamas or Fatah would welcome similar freedom. But “criticism” that is merely repetition of lies (“apartheid state”, “starvation in Gaza”, “right of return”) or meets the “3D” definition of anti Semitic statements (demonization, delegitimization, double standards) should be pointed out when it occurs.

    Since JVP couldn't do that without offending its core audience, they just shut down all comments.

  3. Anonymous July 31, 2011 at 4:32 pm #

    This is not, I repeat, not a crass commercial announcement. This is a statement in favor of tolerance, acceptance and darned good hot chocolate.

    East Coast friends: A new Max Brenner Chocolate shop has opened locally. As you might know, other Max Brenner shops have been violently attacked because they are Jewish, er, Israeli owned.

    So , go. have a cup of hot chocolate. Do it for peace. Do it as a great big F**k you to the BDS haters out there

    BOSTON – 745 BOYLSTON (BACK BAY DISTRICT)
    Now Open!
    For reservations, please click the link below. For reservations for parties of 7 or more, we ask that you call the restaurant directly (617-274-1741).

    Hours of Operation:
    Mon – Fri – 11:00am till very late night (Full Dining & Bar Menu)
    Sat & Sun – 10:00am – 3:00pm (Brunch)
    Sat & Sun – 3:00pm till late late (Full Dining & Bar Menu)

  4. Anonymous August 1, 2011 at 2:20 pm #

    God bless Israel!

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes