Cost

I promised to post some news on the BDS comings and goings abroad, and the two stories that have made the international press of late include boycott and divestment attempts at the University of Johannesburg in South Africa and at the municipality of Marrickville in Australia.

Regarding the former, I wrote last year on the importance of South African support (whether genuine or simply alleged) in the Apartheid Strategy of which Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions is merely a tactic. After all, how better to brand Israel an “Apartheid State” than have those who lived through the real thing supposedly echoing your claims.

As that series pointed out, support for the Apartheid slur among actual Apartheid survivors is mixed (Tutu yes, Mandala not really). And in the US, African Americans are starting to get resentful of having a cause they fought for hijacked for the needs of narrow anti-Israel partisans. And despite the fact that the University of Johannesburg (UJ) as recently as last year refused to back a proposal to break ties with Ben Gurion University (BGU) in Israel, the relentless BDS brigades finally found a mechanism (a vote by the university’s Senate) to end the school’s relationship with their Israeli counterparts.

Now the leadership of UJ was quick to deny that the school is now participating in an academic boycott of Israelis (even as those that pushed the break with BGU claim just the opposite). But to get a true sense of what the cost of BDS can be for a community, one need only look at the specifics regarding the vote that gave the boycotters their desired “win.”

For in this case, the vote simply ended a contractual arrangement whereby BGU provided their South African colleagues access to Israeli expertise in the area of water purification technology, something direly needed by South African’s poor struggling with limited, and often polluted, water supplies. So in this case the BDS “victory” came at the expense not of those who decided the matter (who no doubt have access to all the bottled water they want or need), but of less-well-off (and mostly black) South Africans who may care more about quenching their thirst with unpolluted H2O than in allowing a group of academics to strike a pose and brag to their international colleagues that UJ is now on the cutting edge of the BDS “juggernaut.”

The second story covers less serious ground (“preposterous” is the word that comes to mind). In a Back to the Future moment, the first municipality since Somerville, MA decided to create its own foreign policy, in this case the local government of Marrickville in Australia voting to begin a boycott and divestment campaign targetting products on the BDS blacklist.

The vote was initiated by the Green Party who (as with most successful BDS votes) got their measure passed before the community knew what was happening. And like all similar divestment stories, holy hell broke loose the moment word went out on the “Israel-is-always-wrong-about-everything” wires that another great boycott “victory” was achieved.

In this case, holy hell involved someone pointing out that for the locality to actually live by these newly voted “principles,” it would have to cancel contracts and end use of (among other things) IT equipment that would, in the end, cost the town more than $3.5MM (Australian).

Once an actual price tag became involved, the appeal of BDS grew decidedly less bright. And once this financial cost got bundled with a political price (politicians supporting the boycott proposal went down in flames at a recent election) it wasn’t long before those noble divestment advocates started scrambling for the exits trying to put a brave pose on their rapidly crumbling cause.

Fortunately for Australians, this boycott blow up only led to the pinch-faced, Green Party generalissimo responsible for this mayhem having to struggle to find some way to save punim (by crafting a proposal that will allow them to claim the alleged moral high ground of boycott without actually having to boycott anything).

But unlike Johannesburg, at least at Marrickville this preening hypocrisy is not likely to cost anyone their life.

, , , , , ,

7 Responses to Cost

  1. Anonymous April 22, 2011 at 4:12 pm #

    I wonder what the costs have been to the Palestinians over the past 44 or 63 years. As the old saying goes “a picture is better than a thousand words”.

    The raping of a people:

    http://www.icahd.org/?page_id=76

  2. DrMike April 22, 2011 at 8:11 pm #

    Indeed, the Palestinians have paid an enormous cost for their leadership's refusal to accept an independent state of Palestine along side a Jewish state of Israel– they refused in 1947, in 2000, and again in 2009.
    And those who continue to insist that the Palestinians continue hold out for the goal of the rejectionists, including the BDS movement– the elimination of Jewish statehood in the Jewish homeland– are insisting that they continue to suffer the consequences of those historical mistakes.

  3. Jon April 22, 2011 at 9:05 pm #

    And here you have what passes for a BDS “argument” in a nutshell: a gruesome image shoved into people’s faces with a combination of sadomasochistic glee and triumphalism, as if punching at the gut was a form of Socratic dialogue.

    In a way, this type of pathetic (as it “pathos”) form of “debate,” represents the compliment vice (BDS) pays to virtue (the rest of us). After all, if I were to post nothing but grotesque images of Israelis (and Palestinians) beaten, beheaded, shot, stabbed, mutilated and murdered by Palestinians, can you imagine our anonymous poster turning around and saying: “Gosh, maybe non-Palestinians have suffered too. Maybe I should rethink my political decisions in light of such horrible sights.”

    Nope, they would do what they always do: completely ignore it and just post their next grotesque image and accompanying set of groundless accusations. In other words, they are appealing to sympathy (even if they do so in an ugly and manipulative way) under the assumption that we supporters of Israel have the ability to empathize with others that the BDSers so clearly lack.

    I’ve noted before that this type of emotional manipulation is really the only arrow the boycotters have in their quiver. But rarely have I seen it fired so obviously and clumsily as it does in the latest anonymous comment.

    Next

  4. Anonymous April 22, 2011 at 9:55 pm #

    The link contains a series of maps! Not sure about the “sadomasochistic glee and triumphalism”.

    However, I am glad that you perceive of these images/maps as grotesque, because on a certain level, they are truly ugly and grotesque.

    Take a moment to review them, and while you're at, it put yourself in the shoes of the Palestinians.

  5. Anonymous April 23, 2011 at 1:27 am #

    Marrickville mayor Fiona Byrne has conceded that her council’s plan to impose sanctions on Israel will have no impact on its troubled relationship with Palestine. But Byrne remains committed to the Palestinian cause, and has threatened that unless Israel complies with UN resolutions, Marrickville will launch an atomic assault on it.

    Byrne admits that her decision to launch a nuclear war will come into conflict with another previous pointless resolution making Marrickville a nuclear-free zone.

    As part of her willingness to take action, Byrne has also begun deploying Marrickville’s council rangers to the Middle East, where they will issue infringement notices for all Israeli settlers who have parked their vehicles on Palestinian soil.

    Byrne acknowledges that her plan has its critics. “Some say have argued that it’s a complex situation, and that outsiders shouldn’t just waltz in and take sides,” Byrne said. “We plan to bomb them as well.”

    Well worth reading

    http://www.chaser.com.au/2011/marrickville-admits-israel-sanctions-pointless-plans-full-nuclear-strike/

  6. Jon April 23, 2011 at 5:55 pm #

    Whoops! My blunder regarding your link. But a blunder I was glad to have made (and happy to admit to) since it helped me achieve a breakthrough on a point I've been stuck on for a week now.

    Apologies and stay tuned for something I'm working on now entitled “Pathos.”

    Very funny atomic weapons piece, BTW…

  7. Anonymous April 26, 2011 at 3:15 am #

    Every armed conflict generates horrific casualities. The big difference is most cultures seem to feel that it is in bad taste to exploit images of the dead and wounded for sympathy and propaganda. The Palestinians seem to revel in it.

Leave a Reply

Powered by WordPress. Designed by WooThemes